Is it possible for children to have too many toys? I think that there almost certainly is a case against children having as well many toys. I grew up with four younger brothers (about two years between each of us) and our fairly large communal bedroom was lined on two walls with shelving from floor to ceiling with toys and each Christmas there were sacks full of even more toys that we did not have any more room for.
I was the oldest, so you would think that I could pass my baby toys down the line once I had no use for them. That worked while my brothers were actually babies, but as their consciousness began to develop they wanted to play with what I was playing with and so all the toys that I used from, say three to eight years of age were ostracized by my brothers as they leap-frogged over those years and went directly to year eight and nine with me.
But we never got rid of those five years worth of overlooked toys or any other toys either. This would have been in the Fifties and Sixties and I do not believe that recycling was fairly the buzz word back then that it is nowadays.
My parents did not throw them out, we just squirreled them away on the top shelves, which we could not reach anyway. I suppose that after sitting up there for ten years they were finally thrown out but I do not know as I had already left home by then.
The point is that those superfluous toys were not doing anyone in our family any good and they were taking up room. It would have been far better to have given them away or not even to have purchased some of them in the first place.
We always had to have 'one each' so that there would be less squabbling. So, we had items like five plastic trumpets, five tin drums, five plastic guns, five of this and five of that and we hardly ever used them after Christmas Day. We liked to play together at board games like Monopoly, Risk and cards and although I, being the oldest, won nine times out of ten, my brothers never seemed to care.
We also had a train set, Scalectrix and a big box of Lego. We would spend all weekend creating various scenarios with combinations of the train set, a roadway and Lego houses and Lego railway platforms. OK, these three toys were probably expensive, but they were quality, versatile, could be used in combination and, in a way, were educational. These were the toys that we kept on the bottom shelves.
What I am saying is that more is not always better and in the case of toys, more can be simply a waste of money. Instead of all that junk on the top shelves, which was often donated by aunties and uncles by the way, it would have been better to give us a new bridge for the railway set or a new chicane for the Scalectrix or another box of building bricks for our Lego collection.
I was the oldest, so you would think that I could pass my baby toys down the line once I had no use for them. That worked while my brothers were actually babies, but as their consciousness began to develop they wanted to play with what I was playing with and so all the toys that I used from, say three to eight years of age were ostracized by my brothers as they leap-frogged over those years and went directly to year eight and nine with me.
But we never got rid of those five years worth of overlooked toys or any other toys either. This would have been in the Fifties and Sixties and I do not believe that recycling was fairly the buzz word back then that it is nowadays.
My parents did not throw them out, we just squirreled them away on the top shelves, which we could not reach anyway. I suppose that after sitting up there for ten years they were finally thrown out but I do not know as I had already left home by then.
The point is that those superfluous toys were not doing anyone in our family any good and they were taking up room. It would have been far better to have given them away or not even to have purchased some of them in the first place.
We always had to have 'one each' so that there would be less squabbling. So, we had items like five plastic trumpets, five tin drums, five plastic guns, five of this and five of that and we hardly ever used them after Christmas Day. We liked to play together at board games like Monopoly, Risk and cards and although I, being the oldest, won nine times out of ten, my brothers never seemed to care.
We also had a train set, Scalectrix and a big box of Lego. We would spend all weekend creating various scenarios with combinations of the train set, a roadway and Lego houses and Lego railway platforms. OK, these three toys were probably expensive, but they were quality, versatile, could be used in combination and, in a way, were educational. These were the toys that we kept on the bottom shelves.
What I am saying is that more is not always better and in the case of toys, more can be simply a waste of money. Instead of all that junk on the top shelves, which was often donated by aunties and uncles by the way, it would have been better to give us a new bridge for the railway set or a new chicane for the Scalectrix or another box of building bricks for our Lego collection.
About the Author:
Owen Jones, the author of this article, writes on a number of subjects, but is now concerned with Lego Keyrings. If you would like to know more, please visit our website at Lego UK.
No comments:
Post a Comment